Answered a question 11/2/2011 at 2:32 am
My mom was on hospice for 16 months. I saw the good, the bad, and the ugly of hospice. It was a not for profit hospice, but as Mom lingered on and on I definitely got some attitude from the office,
...Read MoreMy mom was on hospice for 16 months. I saw the good, the bad, and the ugly of hospice. It was a not for profit hospice, but as Mom lingered on and on I definitely got some attitude from the office, though not from her team. They definitely liked using the Medicare excuse. They made me mad plenty of times especially because mom was totally bed bound, was not going to get any better and was terminal, but was not actively dying and yet they wanted to kick her off. Her doctor still certified her as terminal, yet they had no problems irking me about it. Sometimes I felt like they saw me as a lowly unpaid servant and they could vent on me - they did not seem to see me as an exhausted daughter in her early 30's who was losing her mother. I did end up taking her off of hospice - mostly because I had enough of them to do me a life time and I was certain my life expectancy had been decreased because of the experience. She lived another 6 months after I took her off. She was just so sick - throwing up a lot - I was fed up with her not getting the comfort treatment she needed. The problem that everyone overlooked was she had been on prednisone without an anti-reflux medicine for most of the 16 months (I did not even realize she needed it.) That steroid was eating up her stomach. So her suffering could have been eased very simply, but because hospice was acting as if there was nothing that could be done and we should just accept she was dying. They get into this mind frame because they do not want to be aggressive and tend overlook simple solutions. They were good at day to day type care, but when it came to any crisis stuff it was a good thing I had a background in medicine - but there were still days I did not think I knew enough.
Anyway, DT, I am glad your mom has such a wise and caring doctor and son, too. Even if hospice might be able to get out of paying for the transfusions, they cannot keep her from getting them. There is a way to go off of hospice and then go back on. Also she can still take her regular medications while on hospice. They only have to pay for the medicines which are related to the terminal diagnosis. Insulin was even paid for because the steroid my mom was on to keep the edema down in her brain from the tumor caused her blood sugar to shoot up. The steroid was a comfort measure - to keep the swelling down and prevent pain. If she had not had insulin, she would have gone into a diabetic coma and died. I also required them to treat UTI's and once she had pneumonia - I requested Levaquin and she pulled through. I believed in treating treatable infections and that it was a comfort measure. As long as she responded to the treatments I believed that she was not actively dying and should be treated. When it was her time, I had no problem stopping treatments and just "knew" when to say no more. Treating infections was also part of her living will she had made before appointing me as her MPOA plus she had prepared me for years for what she wanted. I also always talked to her about the decisions and let her make them as long as she could. Some in hospice believe in no treatments and stopping all medicines unless they are for comfort reasons, but they need to respect that each individual should be able to decide if and when they discontinue their medications even when they are on hospice. From a medical policy angle, hospice does allow for a lot more than some hospices want to deliver and some do get by with this because many families do not know any better and they are so overwhelmed they are not for sure where to turn.
A good resource I found on line was Patient's Hospice Alliance.