Follow
Share
Read More
This question has been closed for answers. Ask a New Question.
Find Care & Housing
I too am no attorney but I was thinking that the reasoning behind the attorney replacing you as DPOA was because your brother tarnished everything through his fraudulent actions. Doesn't mean YOU did anything wrong and as DPOA you cannot be held liable for what your brother does but maybe the attorney thought that in the future it would be simpler to just have the family not being responsible for anything.

I can understand why you would take it personally but I don't think it was personal. If the attorney took those actions just to alleviate any family involvement in the future it might not have been such a bad idea. Again, you did nothing wrong and you are not responsible for your brother's actions, this could just be to simplify things and a proactive decision on the attorney's part to stave off any potential family problems in the future.
Helpful Answer (3)
Report

Hi Always my duty: Thanks for your comments!

I did indeed email the Attorney and I asked him to clarify for me what in fact he told my Father and Uncle as it pertained to me being liable in any way. I believe and I may be wrong, but because it was my father who relayed the message to me what the Attorney told him, with my dads short term memory issues, maybe he forgot some details. But I'm hoping the Attorney could have said..."we need to immediately remove me as the DPOA in case the Credit Card Companies would somewhere down the line ever investigate this and find that Fraud by my brother took place. Now for the life of me, I can't imagine why in the hell any CC company would run an investigation into Fraud unless somebody brought it to their attention. Even if my brother decides not to keep making payments on all these debts, it will still only be turned over to a collections agency and of course ruin my father's clean credit, but they don't just randomly say "oh let's run an investigation into CC Fraud!! So, I'm very interested in seeing the Attorney's comment. One more thing that doesn't make sense either, he evidently told my Father and Uncle, we can keep me on there, we just need him to be put down to the 3rd person.???? Well WTH, that makes no sense to me. Also, why they decided to remove my sister altogether is another issue we must take up with them when we all meet. So it's a very complicated situation that unfortunately due to one person's inappropriate actions(brother) trickle's down and touches many innocent individuals.
Helpful Answer (1)
Report

Horserider,WOW!!! thank you so very much for your insight. As I was reading your comment, I felt as though you were actually part of the family!!! you hit on every single item that is of major concern to myself as well as my sister. Just to answer a quick question you had at the beginning, no my Father has not been classified as legally incompetent by medical staff. He has though according to the medical staff beginning stages of what they believe is dementia. Last year he fought off an episode of Encephilitis of the Brain believe it or not and is doing quite well. Physically functioning on his own, dresses himself, showers with very little assistance, the only real issue is that his short term memory is just not there. His long term memory is 100% better than mine!! The doctors just felt though that based on everything he experienced fighting this battle and with the memory issues it best that he lives with someone 24/7. As you touched on it, family is much better than Assisted Living and obviously much more practical from a cost standpoint. To answer your question towards the end, even though my brother indeed has an illness, he and his wife do in fact take great care of him. So thank you so very much for your input, I shall take your comments and share them with my sister so we at least have some ideas to possibly discuss both with the family and with the attorney. Thank you again!!!
Helpful Answer (0)
Report

I can't offer legal advice so I hope whoever can, helps you. I am curious why you are responsible for what your brother did. What was the reason the lawyer wanted you and your sister removed? I'd definitely want an answer for this "suggestion". It doesn't sound right to me.
Not to be disrespectful to the nice lawyers on AC, but my mother's lawyer was horrible. I don't want to get into it, but he did some underhanded things which have cost me a lot of money. If I was going to the electric chair, he'd be the last person I'd call if you get my meaning.
I wouldn't trust your dad's lawyer. I'd find my own. If I were being accused or it was suggested that I'd done wrong when I knew I hadn't, you'd bet I'd be protecting my ass.
Helpful Answer (0)
Report

Is your Dad still "competant"? Was the attorney's suggestion to put your uncle as DPOA? Is it time to have your Dad declared incompetant. My understanding in CA is that POA is not responsible for mistakes since elder can still do stuff on their own, but once they are declared incompetant DPOA is more responsible since they are "in charge". If your Dad was not competant then the credit card companies shouldn't have issued the cards to him.

Few thoughts -- I am NOT giving legal advice, and am NOT a lawyer -- just brain-storming for ideas for you to talk over with a lawyer (ideas are hopefully worth at least the price of them!)
First -- IMHO you DID do due diligence -- you caught the fraud! Maybe credit card companies can be notified not to issue credit cards to your fathers SS# . If your Dad has not yet been declared "incompetant" I don't think there is anything you could have done to prevent this except maybe notify credit card companies not to issue credit cards to his SS# due to past fraud/identity theft. While your brother has the same name, he does NOT have the same SS# , so his actions in applying for cards (and forging your Dad's name - even though it is also his name, it was on a document with someone else's SS#---same as if it were a complete stranger with the same name).
Just one thought though -- As bad as your brother's behavior is, everything is "still in the family" at this point, and no fraud has been reported, It is possible that your Dad's instinct to keep everything quiet isn't a bad idea. If there is enough $ to care for your Dad for his expected life-time your Dad has not been "harmed", he's just spending money unwisely, and what has been spent is just your potential inheritance. Until the government (APS, medicare or Public Guardian) is involved it's still a family affair. If your Dad has enough money to live on I don't know who will kick up a fuss or ask any questions other than you guys, so it may be better to ignore/prevent future problems than go through with a process of removing yourselves from DPOA (again -- I'm not a lawyer). DO consult with someone about how to prevent elder fraud (anonymously maybe?). I know there are things like identity theft alert services that could prevent future problems & there might be credit-card blocking avail.

Second thought - Consult and get a 2nd legal opinion from an estate/elder law attorney or legal aide for seniors (maybe worth paying someone who will NOT "get the client"). Not all attorneys are equal, and even if this first guy is excellent there may be a bit of butt-covering on his part since he wrote up original paperwork that did NOT protect your Dad.
Third thought - KEEP EVERYTHING IN THE FAMILY--at all costs! Uncle as DPOA, you guys again listed as 2nd & 3rd maybe? Can't see why you need to be removed from estate/will. Maybe the three of you could work together, you keep checking bills etc. & everything go on as before, but with extra protection from fraud (DPOA is NOT required to do the bill-paying, or keep an eye on the money -- a book-keeper could be hired to do the same thing). Also, just because one person is listed as DPOA doesn't mean they have to do all the work -- they just have to sign off on the papers.
PLEASE do not replace family with a professional conservator if you can possibly avoid it -- it may get offered as an "easy way out", but it is anything but "easy" and can ABSOLUTELY be as bad as all of the horror stories you read. It will cost more than the $ your brother has stolen (and yes, "stolen" IS the right word. Your brother is an addict and a thief).


OK, possible solution - I have seen creative things done in similar situation-
example; Grandson got $ out of grandpa for a new car, and conservator "deducted from his future inheritance" rather than try to get it back (money was gone). Might that be an option in this case? The $40k could be written as a loan to your brother, to be paid back from bro's inheritance (I presume the three of you are getting equal inheritance?). Make the loan terms clear that you DO expect him to repay so that the IRS can't consider it a "gift" (if there isn't $40k for him at the end then your brother will owe other heirs some $).
Maybe the "loan" could be paid back gradually from whatever your brother is earning a caregiver for your Dad? You don't say that there are any problems with his care of your Dad, & that is a HUGE deal. Even though your brother is an addict, thief, jerk, etc., the cost of hired caregivers is extremely high, and finding appropriate people is HARD.
Helpful Answer (2)
Report

This question has been closed for answers. Ask a New Question.
Ask a Question
Subscribe to
Our Newsletter