Dear fellow caregivers,
This morning I came across an opinion piece from the British newspaper "The Guardian" (https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/may/25/family-carers-hidden-face-care-crisis-ed-davey), and it really hit home, even for me as a EU citizen who does not suffer the consequences of caring for a loved one to the same extent as most US-citizens do.
Still: even here in Europe caregiving is a topic nobody really wants to talk about. It is complicated, unsexy and most of all costly. I guess that in all western societies we are more or less in the same boat when it comes to caregiving to the elders, since it is considered a private, not a societal problem.
I do not want this to become a politically partisan (left-right) topic, but I guess we all agree that we receive too little help/ appreciation/ financial compensation for the non-paid service we are providing for the greater good of society out of love/guilt/responsibility. We are the ones where the bucket stops, who are supposed to ensure basic care for our loved ones, who pay out of our own pockets and who step in when the rest of the family more or less vanishes, often to our own disadvantage, personally, financially and often even regardless of our own health.
Not all of us, but most of us are women. We were educated to value the well-being of others above our own from an early age. To put the needs of others before our own. While following these values was at least widely recognized in earlier (religion-based) times we are nowadays (in neoliberal value systems) considered as losers who are not contributing to our countries' GNP, despite our unpaid service to society.
The problem is not going away but over the next decades for demographic reasons will only be increasing, when the Boomer generation will retire and need care. Me as a GenXer I have no illusions about being cared for in old age but hope for a good dose of morphine to at least enjoy a painless death.
My parents both have died over the last 1-2 years, but I still suffer from the financial, social and psychological repercussions from my 5 years of caregiving. So I wonder if there could be another way instead of one generation (unwillingly) having to devour the next one.
I'd love to hear any suggestions from you!
Love, Unkraut
I find it useful for me as I have always tended toward social anxiety and a bit of agoraphobia. It will show up at certain times for certain reasons and mostly for me the last bout involved breast cancer surgery, then a month of recovery, then radiation, then a month of recovery from THAT and I got myself comfortable, at almost 83, with being in the safe cave of HOME. Now I need to get back out there. Do the things I loved (sewing, gardening, libraries, walking). And it has been difficult.
The Anxiety workbook has given me great insight and some exercises that help a lot.
So thanks for that recommend. I even BRAVED Haight Street yesterday! THAT takes GUTS!
With me, it's the result of circumstances. My parents were north of 40 when I was born. Their bodies were starting to age at the time I was born. My dad started having back and shoulder problems after I was born. My mom has been afraid of things going wrong for most of my life and she told me she thinks there aren't any honest caregivers out there. She also told me while we were talking about an older Facebook friend of mine that's old enough to be her son that she was too weak and feeble to go through a pregnancy at the time she graduated college.
When the caregiving began, I was fresh out of HS. My parents had been divorced for 2+ years and it was all on me for the most part. My mom was 58 and I was closing in on turning 18. My mom did get some outside help for the TMI stuff and she had a friend drive her to work after I left for college and did so for a couple of months. If I was still in town at that time, it likely would've been on me to be the escort. Drop her off in one part of town and then go to the other part of town for HS. My parents weren't the types that regularly sought out help when extra help was needed and would often turn 4-5 person jobs into 2 person jobs, with me getting the majority of the physical work. That wasn't always the case when it came to seeking extra help, but them having a small number of able-bodied friends and living in a small town didn't help matters and I was the youth back that got a lot of work.
And to respond to JoAnn29, you have people who are opting to have kids in their 40s and even 50s. With what I've gone through taking care of one parent sooner than normal and losing the other sooner than normal, no one will convince me that having kids so late in life is a smart move. Should I be childless, unmarried or married to someone around my age, and unable to adopt when I turn 40, I'm not having kids. I don't want my kids to know what I've had to go through to start adulthood. I saw a story from a few years back about an older couple that had a little girl. The mother was 50 and the father was 62. She'll be taking care of at least one of them a lot sooner than normal and we can only hope she doesn't lose her father before she graduates college...or HS.
Caregivers need help. A good, basic outline of the above could make it easier for many.
For those folks with deeper pockets, perhaps start a scholarship at a local school of nursing.
Be an ombudsman at a local nursing home.
Talk to local and state representatives.
Of course the last two suggestions presumes you have the time and energy to do this. Which is how we get stymied to become more insistent about support. Most, if not all, of us are too exhausted to add one more task to a very large pile.
I hope that the stigma of mental illness fades and more people are willing to be treated for such . My mother always refused any meds for her mood and behaviors which only got worse with dementia .
I also have been very open with my own children about what my caregiving experiences were and that I am preparing as best I can to spare them the same .
I believe the pendulum has swung too far and caregivers need to push back for our rights . The problem is the cost of care , trapping families into caregiving.
In home ec, we had units on home nursing and first aid. We learned bed baths, binding wounds, all the things a home caregiver needs to know to take care of a sick family member. I have been grateful for those lessons because I've recalled and used that knowledge as a caregiver for four family members.
But guess what - home nursing and home ec weren't on the state placement exam. The boys with their science classes placed higher in percentiles. They are (mostly) the ones who were admitted to college where science was a big deal. Their higher placement scores produced scholarships. I'm not saying that girls didn't qualify to major in science careers. Many did. But it was harder for them. Harder to be accepted into med school, dentistry, engineering.
But easier to become a caregiver! We knew how to roll old pantyhose into donuts to ease pressure on the elbows and prevent bedsores. We could do first aid for a compound fracture. So who gets to take care of demented Grampy when he slips and breaks his ulna? The ones with the ovaries! Women!
These days, I doubt that home ec, first aid, and caregiving are in curriculums. Many caregivers are coming into the fold with no preparation for the job that is thrust upon them. They're computer engineers, doctors, lab techs.
Where are the caregivers coming from now? Where will they come from in the future? Maybe it would be better to give every elder a magic pill when they reach their expiration date. But who would decide when that is?
Perhaps this should be decided by the same people who determined that I not be allowed to take science classes but home ec instead. They were allowed to diminish my chances of entering a science profession by sacrificing me on the altar of caregiving when I was only 13. So why not give them the power to declare that an elder reaching age 90, let's say, is no longer useful to society and buh-bye?
Noooo. NO! We don't want to do that. We want them to live as long as possible! Anybody in favor of girls taking home ec and learning to roll nylon donuts these days? To the detriment of their careers as physicists and engineers? Ha!
When you live in a small town, like myself, I didn't know there was any other way, I felt like a prisoner with no choices. I feel the only way is to keep reaching out to people, when the caregiving subject arises. Recently an old gf of mine said something to me about, who is going to take care of me when I'm unable to take care of myself, since you have no Girls. I told her, girls or not , I didn't have children, to ruin there life taking care of my old a&&, I love my children to much for that!! The look of utter terror in her face , was actually priceless, and she said well , her daughter is going to take care of her. I also go on reddit a lot to show people there is another life out there, this is not the way it has to be. You do not have to feel like your parents slave , the rest of your life!!
So I'm very vocal about this to others.
There is a saying that dementia does not befall only the person directly suffering from it but the whole family system around him/her. And from my personal experience with a demented mother I absolutely agree. After she died I was "only" caring for my physically frail but mentally healthy father which comparatively was like a walk in the park.
Love
Unkraut
Yes, I thought as well this might be rather a topic for the discussion section. So I am not at all against my question being transferred there.
As you mentioned the problem of care is clearly connected to the demographical shift. But both are mainly deriving from women rejecting to accept non-paid care work while being financially dependent of their husband's good-will anymore (starting from hormonal contraception in the 60s - a reason why already the late boomers reproduced less).
The other reason is the pharma industry having contributed to elderly folks to live longer and longer. While caring for an elderly relative in the 1950's lasted in average 6-10 months until their death nowadays the span of caring for old parents lasts rather 6-10 years.
So many of today's women experience a stretch of unpaid care work over 20-30 years, starting with childcare in their 30s and blending into care for the elderly in their late 40s to 50s without any break.
For myself I did not take on direct 24/7 caregiving. As an RN I learned early on I was not mentally, physically, emotionally able to do 24/7 care for anyone. My family had no expectations of such a sacrifice and would not have allowed it, nor would I allow my child to do that.
I would say that there is, however, no way to avoid the pain and loss that family stands witness to when their parents, spouses, siblings become ill and aged. There are many times in life when we have difficult issues to face, and this is certainly one of the most difficult of all.
I would say the one thing that we do learn here on AC is that it take a lifetime of good luck, good timing, good savings habits, determination and good jobs to come to a place where one is "self insured" and able to afford decent care. To pay for the care of a relative is to make one's self not only UNSAFE in age, but dependent on family who may or may not be able to afford contributing to care.
There are many issues afoot here. Part of it is medical community and a failure to address with elders exactly what prolonging life at any cost and risk amounts to. Elders often fail to appoint family qualified to act as POA, avoid making wills (which should be done when young) and advance directives, and fail to speak with doctors about catastrophic illnesses.
The government currently spends much much much more money on Medicare, Medi-cal and Defense than on anything else. How long it can sustain the costs when the younger generation isn't having as many children as past generations, is a question for the future; I will be long dead. All of my grandchildren range from 20 to 34. There are four in my combined family with my partner. Not only do they not one have children nor have married, but they have no intention of doing either.